Which is better for gaming AMD FX 8350 vs Intel i5?

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel’s processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%.

When did the AMD FX 8350 come out?

Piledriver Core (Vishera, 32 nm)

Model number Step. Release date
8350 C0 2012 10/23
8370 2014 9/2
9370 2013 7/6

Which is better AMD FX 8350 or Intel i7 3770k?

And in gaming the Intel CPUs still give a lot more – in our tests we were looking at an extra 10-15 per cent. As you can see from the benchmark results, the i7-3770K is still the top desktop chip on pretty much all counts, but at $150 more than the latest FX-8350 you’re paying through the nose for that extra performance.

Which is better Intel i5 2500K or FX-8350?

The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel’s two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance.

What are the specs of the AMD FX-8350?

AMD FD8350FRHKBOX FX-8350… When AMD was throwing around the specs of its first bulldozer chips we all sat up and took notice. After all, it was AMD’s first new CPU technology redesign for an absolute age, and what it was planning on doing with the new bulldozer microarchitecture looked pretty darned revolutionary.

Which is better AMD i5 3570k or AMD hex core?

An equivalently priced AMD hex-core machine then would make for a better gaming PC than an i5 3570K rig with a weaker GPU. We need AMD to be competitive to keep the PC market vibrant, and keep Intel honest. These new Piledriver chips should be able to do that, especially at the value end of the market.